The growth ceiling in the trades

An electrical or plumbing company that is good at what it does rarely runs out of work. It runs out of the capital required to say yes to all of it at once.

The arithmetic is unforgiving. Taking on a larger job means more crew on payroll, more material bought up front, sometimes more vans and tools — and the money for all of it leaves before the first draw arrives. Take two of those jobs simultaneously and the requirement doubles while the receivables schedule stays exactly as slow as it was. Many contractors end up declining work not because they cannot do it, but because they cannot float it.

That is the constraint this business was working against: demand was there, and the capital to service it at the scale on offer was not.

What we did

RAN Funding is a broker, not a lender. The company completed one application and provided the last four months of business bank statements, and that single file went out across our lender network rather than the owner applying to one funder at a time between job sites.

A funding specialist then walked the owner through the offers that came back — how each repayment was structured, how the schedule sat against the company’s billing cycle, what the total cost of capital worked out to, and what each option would leave available for the next contract.

The placement closed at $550,000 in working capital on a 24-month term, funded in 72 hours.

Why the 24-month term matters here

The term length is the part of this placement worth understanding, because it is what makes the amount workable.

Spread across 24 months, a $550,000 facility carries a payment a contracting business with steady billing can plan around. Compressed into a much shorter window, the same amount would demand a repayment rate that competes with payroll every week — which is exactly how funding intended to enable growth ends up constraining it instead.

This is the trade-off at the center of every funding decision at this size, and it is why comparing offers on amount alone is a mistake. A larger approval on a punishing schedule is worth less than a slightly smaller one that the business can carry comfortably. The full breakdown is here: term loan vs. line of credit vs. revenue-based funding at $250,000+.

What $550,000 funds in a trade business

• Payroll through the ramp. Crews go on the clock well before the first progress payment lands.
• Materials at volume. Wire, fixtures, pipe and equipment ordered ahead of the work, often at better pricing for the larger buy.
• Expansion capacity. Additional vehicles, tools and licensed staff — the things that let a company run two crews where it used to run one.
• New project mobilization. The fixed costs of standing up a job before it produces anything.
• Room to bid. Capital in place is often what allows a contractor to bid the next job rather than pass on it.

Funding above $500,000

RAN Funding places business funding from $20,000 to $500,000+, and this placement sits in the part of the range most contractors assume is closed to them. It is not — but it is read more closely. Above $500,000, deposit volume has to support the request, documentation goes beyond bank statements to year-to-date financials and often accounts receivable aging, and signed backlog becomes meaningful context because it speaks to forward revenue.

For another placement above this line, see the $600,000 term loan for a Florida concrete restoration company, which funded in 48 hours because the financials were ready on day one.

Frequently asked questions